Syria, Iran, Lebanon: Israel puts U.S. government under constant pressure


The rumours about the ‘use of chemical arms’ by the Syrian army came from the Israel’s top military intelligence last week. The service claimed that ‘elements of the Syrian Army loyal to President Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against rebels and to murder civilians in Aleppo’…

April 23, 2013  – ‘Israeli intel: Damascus used chemical weapons against rebels’

April 26, 2013  – U.S.-Israel sign new arms deal, but Obama team refuses to sell bunker buster bombs.

April 26, 2013 – ‘Close confidante of Netanyahu warns “it’s now or never” for military strike on Iran’

April 26, 2013  – ‘U.S. says Syria used chemical weapons: Countdown to military action against Damascus?’


For News of the Syrian News Agency Sana:


About kruitvat

I am working for the Belgian human rights association 'Werkgroep Morkhoven' which revealed the Zandvoort childporn case (88.539 victims). The case was covered up by the authorities. During the past years I have been really shocked by the way the rich countries of the western empire want to rule the world. One of my blogs: «Latest News Syria» (WordPress)/ Je travaille pour le 'Werkgroep Morkhoven', un groupe d'action qui a révélé le réseau pornographique d'enfants 'Zandvoort' (88.539 victims). Cette affaire a été couverte par les autorités. Au cours des dernières années, j'ai été vraiment choqué par la façon dont l'Occident et les pays riches veulent gouverner le monde. Un de mes blogs: «Latest News Syria» (WordPress)/ Ik werk voor de Werkgroep Morkhoven die destijds de kinderpornozaak Zandvoort onthulde (88.539 slachtoffers). Deze zaak werd door de overheid op een misdadige manier toegedekt. Gedurende de voorbije jaren was ik werkelijke geschokt door de manier waarop het rijke westen de wereld wil overheersen. Bezoek onze blog «Latest News Syria» (WordPress) ------- Photo: victims of the NATO-bombings on the Chinese embassy in Yougoslavia
This entry was posted in Geen categorie and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Syria, Iran, Lebanon: Israel puts U.S. government under constant pressure

  1. kruitvat says:

    Even the Saudis who are paying the foreign intervention in Syria urges US to pressure Israel…

    ‘Saudis urge US to pressure Israel’

    Apr 9, 2009

    RIYADH // Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister said yesterday the “dangerous policies” of Israel’s new right-wing government required firm international action, particularly from the United States, to “prompt Israel” to reverse course.

    Prince Saud al Faisal also said the seven-year-old Arab peace plan, so far mostly ignored by Israel, only remained relevant if Israel responded. The British foreign secretary, David Miliband, joined his Saudi host in calling for Israel and the Palestinians to return to the peace process. Both sides, Mr Miliband said, must abide by their predecessors’ commitments. For Israel, that meant a freeze in settlements in the occupied West Bank, and for Palestinians, it meant security guarantees for Israel.
    The two officials displayed unity on other regional issues, including Iran’s nuclear programme, recent violence in Iraq and the instability in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Mr Miliband, addressing the latter, said both countries “believe strongly that there needs to be social and economic development at the heart of the Afghan and Pakistan political reconciliation. There will not be a military solution in those countries”. The Afghan government “should lead a process of reconciliation with all those willing to live within the constitution of Afghanistan and above all live by the principle of non-violence”.
    Mr Miliband and Prince Saud lamented the surge in violence in Iraq, where suicide bombers have killed scores of civilians in recent days. On Iran’s nuclear programme, Prince Saud said he “welcomes the positive direction of the US government in its desire to address the [problem] diplomatically through dialogue”. He added that Saudi Arabia believed the “only solution” to the threat posed by the Iranian programme was to rid the region of all weapons of mass destruction, including those held by Israel.
    Mr Miliband also praised the “new American approach”. Iran’s “nuclear proliferation programme … is a threat to the whole international community and it’s very important that there is maximum possible unity behind the new American approach [with its] potential to bring greater stability to the region”. For Saudi Arabia, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is of great concern and hugely frustrating, partly because its closest western ally, the US, has for many years tolerated Israeli foot-dragging in the peace process.
    Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government is one of the most right-wing in Israeli history. His foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, said this week the international community “should not stand over us with a stopwatch in hand” nor interfere in Israeli government policies. “We have never interfered in the affairs of others and we expect from others that they not interfere in ours,” said Mr Lieberman, who has called for Israel’s Arab citizens to take loyalty oaths or lose citizenship.
    Prince Saud said “negative remarks” by officials in the new Israeli government and their failure to accept the commitments of prior governments were putting “the peace process back to square one”. He urged the international community, particularly the US, to get Israel to abide by those commitments. Earlier, the prince said in prepared remarks before a gathering of British and Saudi officials: “It is clear that Israel, which has until now frustrated all peace efforts, whose new government has declared dangerous policies, cannot be expected to automatically change its stand.
    “This requires a solid and firm international action, especially on the part of the United States, to prompt Israel to change its policies.” Asked later how long the Saudi-sponsored Arab peace initiative would remain on the table, Prince Saud said it would be Israel that removed it by failing to respond to it. “If it continues to be disregarded by Israel, [then] it is Israel that is taking the proposal off the table and not the Arab countries. So having it on the table is only relevant if it receives a response from Israel.”
    The plan, endorsed by the Arab League, offers Israel full diplomatic recognition in return for withdrawal to its 1967 borders and an independent Palestinian state.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s