Photo: American Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, left, escorts United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon into the Pentagon as Ban Ki-moon arrives for an honor cordon, Thursday, April 18, 2013.
Ban Ki-moon has very close ties with the American government.
He earned a Master of Public Administration from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. He further received an honorary degree of Doctor of Laws from the University of Washington. He has been posted twice to the South Korean embassy in Washington, D.C. Between these two assignments he served as Director-General for American Affairs in 1990–1992. He was the foreign minister of South Korea from January 2004 to November 2006 and in February 2006, he began to campaign for the office of Secretary-General.
While he is continuously talking in a hypocrite way about the ‘Syrian Civil War’ and he continuously criticizes the Syrian government, he remains silent about the American en Saudi-Arabian arms deliveries to the so called ‘Free Syrian Army’ and Syrian terrorist groups. Yesterday a top commander of a foreign-backed group fighting against the Syrian government said he has received a 35-ton arms shipment from Saudi Arabia…
On March 23, 2011, the U.N. Security Council adopted a wide-ranging resolution recommending ‘humanitarian’ and military action inside Libya. Both U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa were assigned key roles in “coordinating” the implementation of the mandate. Just like now, Ban Ki-moon was calling for “an immediate end to violence by all parties’. Just like now, he was talking about ‘chemical weapons’ and he called for a ‘no-fly zone’ which was just a pretext to bomb Lybia and to destroy the regime of Colonel Gadaffi. While the Lybian infrastructure was completely destroyed, he said the UN-mandated military operation was ‘proving effective in protecting civilians’.
Recently Ban Ki-moon is echoing the Russian en Syrian proposes for a ‘political dialogue’ but at the same time he imposes unreasonable requirements that makes such a dialogue impossible. The current United States Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry, who expects a failure of political dialogue, said ‘recent military gains by Assad’s forces were only temporary’. So it is clear that the American government still hopes on a military intervention.
It is certainly not good for the credibility of the UN that its Secretary-General, as a friend to U.S. national interests in the United Nations, only advances U.S. and western-backed approaches in the Middle East, North Africa, and North Korea.